Role-based screens
Strong signal
AI-reviewed evidence
Faster review
Interview-ready shortlist
Cleaner handoff


Resume says React
Cannot structure components
Claims backend experience
Fails API + database task
Lists cloud skills
No hands-on deployment proof
Looks senior on paper
Weak debugging signals
Clean signal should feel obvious in one glance: what the candidate claims, what the work proves, and what should happen next.

Role Brief
Adaptive Screen
Runtime Evidence
AI Recruiter Brief
Interview Ready

Frontend Developer
React + TypeScript
Component structure, state, and accessibility
Match
91%
Backend Developer
Node.js + PostgreSQL
APIs, validation, and data modeling
Match
88%
Full-Stack Engineer
Frontend + Backend + DB
End-to-end delivery and integration
Match
86%
Cloud / Salesforce
Workflow + integration
Workflow logic, data rules, and automation
Match
82%
01
Let candidates write real code inside practical lab environments instead of answering shallow quiz questions.
02
Run tests, validate outputs, and capture runtime evidence before engineering teams review manually.
03
Summarize correctness, logic, code quality, performance, and role alignment in recruiter-friendly language.
04
Move qualified candidates into the next round without endless email coordination.
Ask iPuls: “Which candidates are ready for frontend interview?”
Top candidate
Ananya Rao
Reason
Strong React + API evidence
Concern
Minor accessibility gaps
Next action
Schedule technical interview
Candidate has sufficient role evidence for a technical interview. Strong component structure, API integration, and debugging behavior. Recommend moving forward with a 45-minute engineering interview.
Screening time
↓ 80%
Reduce manual screen-to-interview effort.
Engineering load
Filtered
Send only stronger candidates for review.
Candidate proof
Practical
Use labs, tests, and execution evidence.
Scheduling
Assisted
Coordinate interviews with less back-and-forth.